Mike and Dave try to guess eachother's numbers

dear dave,

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:49:34 -0400

158 is wrong. so, how’s it hanging? want to start another blog where we only ask each other how’s it hanging?

mike,

Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:15:04 -0400

I am packing up all the bullshit in my office to change offices and I found my number guessing list. it made me think: 158?

maybe this works, dave. wow. sure is a mess.

Tue, 05 May 2009 11:33:32 -0400

i’m in la. not a good town to be guessing numbers in. but i will try. Reply Forward David Neevel I hear you. I think I guessed a number there once, and it was wrong. 11:24 AM (8 minutes ago) David NeevelLoading… 11:24 AM (8 minutes ago) David Neevel to me show details 11:24 AM (8 minutes ago) Reply I hear you. I think I guessed a number there once, and it was wrong. - Show quoted text - On 5/5/09 6:26 AM, “michael illick” wrote: > i’m in la. not a good town to be guessing numbers in. but i will try. Reply Forward michael illick all the sun makes you realize how unimportant guessing numbers is. new york i… 11:28 AM (3 minutes ago) michael illickLoading… 11:28 AM (3 minutes ago) michael illick to David show details 11:28 AM (3 minutes ago) Reply all the sun makes you realize how unimportant guessing numbers is. new york is so guess a number! guess a number! guess a number! guess a number! guess a number! portland is kind of a nice middle ground for guessing numbers. - Show quoted text - On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, David Neevel wrote: > I hear you. I think I guessed a number there once, and it was wrong. > > > > On 5/5/09 6:26 AM, “michael illick” wrote: > » i’m in la. not a good town to be guessing numbers in. but i will try. > > Reply Forward David Neevel to me show details 11:29 AM (2 minutes ago) Reply OK, now let’s send these 3 emails to the number guessing blog. - Show quoted text - On 5/5/09 8:28 AM, “michael illick” wrote: > all the sun makes you realize how unimportant guessing numbers is. new > york is so guess a number! guess a number! guess a number! guess a > number! guess a number! > portland is kind of a nice middle ground for guessing numbers. > > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, David Neevel wrote: » I hear you. I think I guessed a number there once, and it was wrong. » » » » On 5/5/09 6:26 AM, “michael illick” wrote: » »> i’m in la. not a good town to be guessing numbers in. but i will try. » » Reply Forward michael illick to wipreq113 show details 11:31 AM (1 minute ago) Reply like this?

Fwd: oh and dave,

Tue, 05 May 2009 11:31:32 -0400

like this?

hey dave,

Tue, 05 May 2009 09:26:04 -0400

wow. not so much number guessing. wow. 277 and 529 are not my numbers.

mike,

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:50:43 -0400

is your number 529?

mike if people could post comments on the number guessing blog, what do you think they would comment about?

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:57:02 -0400

I bet they would encourage us.

mike, is your number 277?

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:56:01 -0400

or is it some other number?

mike, it feels like it's been a week since I did a number guess

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:55:03 -0400

but it has been 16 days.

mike, 561 is a good guess, but wrong

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:29:03 -0400

were you working on that guess for the last two weeks during the time when you weren¹t doing guesses?

mike, ross is doing well

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:48:31 -0400

did you know that he is engaged to be married?

hey dave, about guessing your number;

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:47:32 -0400

561?

dave, i also might only use the number blog to contact you.

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:42:37 -0400

number blog. and email. not facebook.

dave,

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:17:24 -0400

how is the rooster, ross?

oh and dave,

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:13:36 -0400

110 is not my number.

dave,

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:12:46 -0400

great megachurch show.

mike, is your number 110?

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:26:23 -0400

mike, is your number 110?

Mike, you might be right about me having guessed 1 already, early on.

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:42:03 -0400

It was Ross¹s idea.

dave,

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:59:19 -0400

pretty sure someone guessed one before. i used the search button. but it was before we started using our christian names. so i can’t remember who guessed one. so to get the ball rolling again: no. it is not one.

mike, people say that 1 is the loneliest number,

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:04:04 -0400

but I wonder if it is actually just the loneliest integer? I bet that .5, for example, is pretty damn lonely. or what about some number that has like 45 decimal places and so nobody ever says its name because it would take too long?